Sign up before Midnight to watch our video,
“Biggest Ponzi Scheme in U.S. History to Crash,”
and get our daily e-letter Investment Contrarians.
We respect your privacy!
We will never rent/sell your e-mail address.
That’s a promise! And you can opt out at any time.
The voting results of Proposition 37 beg the asking of that
question. Studies published here at OEN
show clearly that foods containing genetically modified organisms cause cancer
in rats and humans. Pre-election polls
show that the vast majority of Californians support such labeling. Monsanto spent approximately 45 million dollars
to defeat the proposition and put forth out-right false and misleading
ads. Did some of Monsanto's money go to
rigging voting machines? The pre-election
polls would hint at an election theft.
So why did California voters decide to oppose labeling GMO foods, essentially eliminating the public are right to know if they are feeding their kids carcinogens? The margin was wide, approximately 10%. If there was rigging, an Administration (Barack Obama's) that appoints Monsanto executives to guard against their own activities would be useless in stopping it.
I spoke with Congresswoman Maxine Waters about the defeat of Proposition 37, and she felt the misleading advertising put forth by Monsanto confused the voters.
However, Monsanto did not make the voters fail to notice the words on the ballot or fail to review the propositions before voting. So, again, we're at the question of rigging versus under-education.
Prior to the time Ronald Reagan was Governor, California was number 1 in education. As a result of Reagan's governorship, the education test scores fell dramatically, with California kids often winding up in the bottom 3 in the United States, which scores low when compared with the rest of the industrialized world. This was a long fall from number 1. This decrease in scores may have found its way into an inability to comprehend ballot propositions. That is one way of explaining all the racist propositions that frequently are adopted in a state that professes to be liberal.
John Taylor Gatto, one of the top educators in America and the writer of "Weapons of Mass Instruction," believes the government is intentionally creating a dumbed down society so that Americans will become a mindless work force, willing to do the bidding of the top 1%. He has written several books, such as "The Underground History of American Education," detailing the intentional attack on the ability of children to think.
People with thinking abilities don't like to accidentally feed their kids poison and yet that is how California voters voted.
As people celebrate four more years of torture,
detentions without trial, wars, political assassinations and Wall Street Bailouts, California kids will have to learn to adapt or die of the poisons their parents chose to feed them without warning.
There is no requirement that a person vote for a proposition he or she doesn't understand. California voters need to exercise a minimal amount of self-restraint.
In some districts, voters actually showed some intelligence, returning people's rights advocates Maxine Waters and Barbara Lee to Congress. These two women are expected to lead the Congressional charge in 2013 to end the wars in the Middle East.
Maybe, the answer is revolution, but how do you start a revolution with people who aren't educated enough or activist enough to read and/or demand protection for their ballot?
So why did California voters decide to oppose labeling GMO foods, essentially eliminating the public are right to know if they are feeding their kids carcinogens? The margin was wide, approximately 10%. If there was rigging, an Administration (Barack Obama's) that appoints Monsanto executives to guard against their own activities would be useless in stopping it.
I spoke with Congresswoman Maxine Waters about the defeat of Proposition 37, and she felt the misleading advertising put forth by Monsanto confused the voters.
However, Monsanto did not make the voters fail to notice the words on the ballot or fail to review the propositions before voting. So, again, we're at the question of rigging versus under-education.
Prior to the time Ronald Reagan was Governor, California was number 1 in education. As a result of Reagan's governorship, the education test scores fell dramatically, with California kids often winding up in the bottom 3 in the United States, which scores low when compared with the rest of the industrialized world. This was a long fall from number 1. This decrease in scores may have found its way into an inability to comprehend ballot propositions. That is one way of explaining all the racist propositions that frequently are adopted in a state that professes to be liberal.
John Taylor Gatto, one of the top educators in America and the writer of "Weapons of Mass Instruction," believes the government is intentionally creating a dumbed down society so that Americans will become a mindless work force, willing to do the bidding of the top 1%. He has written several books, such as "The Underground History of American Education," detailing the intentional attack on the ability of children to think.
People with thinking abilities don't like to accidentally feed their kids poison and yet that is how California voters voted.
As people celebrate four more years of torture,
detentions without trial, wars, political assassinations and Wall Street Bailouts, California kids will have to learn to adapt or die of the poisons their parents chose to feed them without warning.
There is no requirement that a person vote for a proposition he or she doesn't understand. California voters need to exercise a minimal amount of self-restraint.
In some districts, voters actually showed some intelligence, returning people's rights advocates Maxine Waters and Barbara Lee to Congress. These two women are expected to lead the Congressional charge in 2013 to end the wars in the Middle East.
Maybe, the answer is revolution, but how do you start a revolution with people who aren't educated enough or activist enough to read and/or demand protection for their ballot?
Sign up before Midnight to watch our video,
“Biggest Ponzi Scheme in U.S. History to Crash,”
and get our daily e-letter Investment Contrarians.
We respect your privacy!
We will never rent/sell your e-mail address.
That’s a promise! And you can opt out at any time.
No comments:
Post a Comment